Brandon Davidson wrote: > Brandon Davidson wrote: >> I guess I never paid all that much attention to it before just now, >> but has the CentOS 5 tree always been missing the HEADER.html and >> HEADER.images links? It's not pretty any more :( >> >> Also, why are the directories inside /5 individually linked to their >> current version, instead of directly linking /5 to /5.2 as was done >> with the 4 series? > > No response to this? CentOS 4 just gets to be prettier than 5? Maybe > I'll see if anyone bites on IRC. > It is done that way because we where going to do a 5.1.x, 5.2.x, etc. now it has been in place for 2 releases I don't think we should now change it -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 251 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20080702/94a23f2d/attachment-0004.sig>