On 19/05/16 15:15, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> On 18/05/16 20:57, Scott wrote:
>>> So the idea would be to have something like
>>> msync-v6.centos.org::CentOS-v6, and ask you to provide us the ipv6
>>> address for your mirror (we can already do that in advance if you
>>> advertise AAAA record on your side for your mirror) and so it would be
>>> an "opt-in" thing (at least as a start)
>>
>> The separate DNS ensures that people will only get what they ask for (v4
>> or v6), but why have a separate module name? Put both v4 and v6 acls on
>> the CentOS module and clients will get the one matching the DNS name they
>> use.
>>
>> Scott.
>
> Yes, that's the plan so msync-v6.centos.org::CentOS .
> I pushed yesterday {cloud,debuginfo,vault,buildlogs} AAAA records (in
> our GeoIP/PDNS backend) so now working on the msync part (and then
> mirror.centos.org too)
>
> Stay tuned
>
So, I just pushed today msync6.centos.org and I also added the ipv6
addresses from this thread in the CentOS rsync module acl.
So can you test that you can sync over ipv6 by using the following
host/path : msync6.centos.org::CentOS ?
After some positive feedback I'll make a bigger/wider announce for the
ipv6 availability for msync and also add mirror.centos.org too
Thanks for your feedback ! :-)
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-mirror/attachments/20160523/2ed52625/attachment-0006.sig>