[CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
Daniel de Kok
danieldk at pobox.comTue Oct 16 19:25:07 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Kai, On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 21:09 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > what's your recommendation for the filesystem "underlayer" for a Xen VM? A > partition, a file, a sparse file? I use files, they are easy to manage. They ease up maintenance, since you can move them around, easily create new ones, etc. But I guess that raw partitions or LVM volumes are faster. Files are good enough for our purposes, but the VMs don't heavily do disk I/O. -- Daniel
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list