[CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
Kai Schaetzl
maillists at conactive.comTue Oct 16 22:32:01 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel de Kok wrote on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:25:07 +0200: > I use files, they are easy to manage. They ease up maintenance, since > you can move them around, easily create new ones, etc. But I guess that > raw partitions or LVM volumes are faster. > > Files are good enough for our purposes, but the VMs don't heavily do > disk I/O. Thanks for the info. I now added the xen stuff to the possible target machine and there the performance situation is much nicer. I'm now testing installation on partitions. I agree handling of the filebased VMs is very nice. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] Xen/VMWare Server comparison and "best Xen practices"?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list