first of all bottom post:-) Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > I forgot to mention that kvm-kmod rpm's are kernel based (they copy > files to specific kernel folders. > > I am right now in the process to build rpm's for several mainstream > kernels from 5.2 and 5.3 for i386 systems. > > you will be able to download it from > http://www.plcomputers.net/download/plc-centos5-custom/ in few hours. > > NOTICE: I am not veteran in rpm build's (but I had help from Farkas > Levente considering proper compiling of kvm-kmod) so please first use > them on non-production systems. > > Ljubomir > > > Julian Price wrote: >> Rainer Traut wrote: >> > >> > But my actual question is, what's the state of lfarkas repository? >> > Can it be trusted? Sadly there is no frontpage on http://www.lfarkas.org/ >> > >> >> Levente Farkas contributes on the centos-devel list and I have seen >> several other posts from people using those RPMs so yes, I trust them. >> >> I have been asking for them to be put them into a repository... >> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2009-April/004419.html >> ...but I guess sorting out issues arising from CentOS 5.3 is higher >> priority right now. >> >> Running KVM as an unpriviledged user is on my to-do list so I will >> follow the outcome of that thread with interest. as i wrote to you this kmod rpm (as all other centos kmods) use weak-updates so the kernel version is not included in the version by desing. it's working with _all_ centos 5.x kernel. anyway i'll provide these rpms until centos-5.4 released and lets see what will be in 5.4 and then... anyway my current suggestion to use kvm-84. as i be able to put together a consistent build far in my end i'll try to provide i386 rpms too, but as i only use 64bit hosts i only compile it. -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"