[CentOS-virt] XEN and RH 6
Pasi Kärkkäinen
pasik at iki.fi
Tue Nov 10 08:00:34 UTC 2009
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:45:56PM +0100, Hildebrand, Nils, 232 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my local RH-salesman told me that rh6 will be based on a mix of Fedora 11/12 - so I hope for the best.
>
Yeah, RHEL6 will be based on Fedora 12 (afaik).
Also, I think RHEL6 will support running as Xen guest (PV domU), but I
don't think they're going to ship dom0 with it..
I really hope they would, but I'm not holding my breath considering how
much they talk about KVM..
> At the moment I am stuck with SLES (currently 10) on our Dom0-servers, since it has the newer XEN-version.
> I would love to move to RH or CentOS with my Dom0s...
>
Upgrade to SLES11 at least then.. I think it has Xen 3.4.1 available and
2.6.27 dom0 kernel.
-- Pasi
>
> Kind regards
>
> Nils
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Pasi Kärkkäinen
> > Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 3:58 PM
> > To: Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] High CPU usage when running
> > aCentOSguestinVirtualBox
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:47:08PM +0100, Hildebrand, Nils, 232 wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this weekend I took a closer look at KVM. I think that the
> > paravirtualized XEN or Hyper-V-Approach is superior to the
> > full virtualization.
> >
> > PV has it's advantages..
> >
> > > Red Hat 6 will have XEN-Support (propably XEN 3.4 with
> > power-consumption savings).
> > >
> >
> > What did you hear this? Is it a fact?
> >
> > -- Pasi
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS-virt mailing list
> > CentOS-virt at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS-virt mailing list
> CentOS-virt at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
More information about the CentOS-virt
mailing list