[CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
Benjamin Franz
jfranz at freerun.comTue Aug 10 20:21:38 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 08/10/2010 02:01 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote: > n order to have the IPs available on some guests, I'm wondering > whether I should: > 1 - add additional virtual interfaces > or > 2 - set up IP aliases (eth0:1, etc.) in the guests > > I imagine that (1) would be faster and more efficient (but that's a > guts feeling), and it feels cleaner. > But with (2), I just need to restart the network in order to add new > IPs (there won't be that many: like around 10 in the next few months), > insteead of restarting the whole guest. > You don't have to restart the guest to add or remove aliases: ifup eth0:1 ifdown eth0:1 work fine for starting and stopping them. -- Benjamin Franz
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list