[CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
Mathieu Baudier
mbaudier at argeo.orgTue Aug 10 14:12:57 UTC 2010
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> You don't have to restart the guest to add or remove aliases: yes I am aware of that, and that's why I'm wondering whether it is better to use aliases rather than to add virtual interfaces (which does require to restart guests with our KVM version, no hot-plug I think). But is there any drawback with using aliases? Or does using virtual interfaces provide additional performance/stability/... ?
- Previous message: [CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
- Next message: [CentOS-virt] IP based VirtualHost: IP aliases vs. additional virtual interfaces
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-virt mailing list