On 05/15/2014 07:05 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > OK, I've got a basic initial port of the xen package up to 4.4.0. But > before I post that, I wanted to get comments on a new method of > managing the Xen part of the patchqueue. You can find the RFC branch > here: > > repo: http://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen > branch: out/git-am-patchqueue-RFC-v1 > > The basic idea is to put as much as possible into a 'git am' file. > This file can easily be imported into git on top of a Xen git > repository with "git am [filename]", rebased / edited like any branch, > and the exported again with "git format-patch -N --stdout > [release-tag]". > > I've got a copy of the Xen repo with the patchqueue applied as a branch here: > > repo: http://github.com/gwd/xen > branch: centos/pq/4.2.4-v1 > > Unfortunately this only works for patches to things in the core Xen > repo; patches to qemu, or the out-of-tree blktap will need to be > managed separately still. However, at the moment those patches are > kind of small. > > Having the patchqueue in this format made rebasing to 4.4 a *lot* easier. assume that we have a git repo per package, then the deps ( like qemu ?pxe etc ) could also use the same process ? Also, would it make sense to consolidate this queue under the github.com/CentOS/<package> repo ? I'm also thinking that we might need a process like this for pretty much everyone else - there isnt a precidence for the SIG's in this regard as yet ( and anecdotally, we use a more manual version of exactly the same process for handling branding/blacklists in the centos distro rpms queue as well ). - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc