On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, John Newbigin wrote: > Also, does anyone know where this link came from: > http://mirror.caosity.org/centos-3/2.0/ > > I think that is a poor idea. If it has a good reason for existing, then > the version should be 2 or 2.1 Of course it should be 2.1 - apologies - the idea is that all of the centos stuff is accessed through centos/ eg centos/3.3 rather than centos-3 should make it easier for 4.0 etc I will try to remember to use that when announcing updates Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.