On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 11:56 +0000, Lance Davis wrote: > On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, John Newbigin wrote: > > > Also, does anyone know where this link came from: > > http://mirror.caosity.org/centos-3/2.0/ > > > > I think that is a poor idea. If it has a good reason for existing, then > > the version should be 2 or 2.1 > > Of course it should be 2.1 - apologies - > > the idea is that all of the centos stuff is accessed through centos/ eg > centos/3.3 rather than centos-3 > > should make it easier for 4.0 etc > > I will try to remember to use that when announcing updates Why don't we do this make a centos dir at the same level as centos-3 then link centos-2, centos-3 etc etc etc all into there. -sv