+++ Edward Croft [Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 01:42:50PM -0400]: > I get the errors: > zip4_lnx.a(generic.o)(.text+0xb16): more undefined references to > `__ctype_b' follow > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_close at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_catch_error at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_addr at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to > `_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol_skip at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to > `_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_loaded at GLIBC_2.1' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_open at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_signal_error at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_global_scope at GLIBC_2.0' > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol_skip at GLIBC_2.0' > > I have the compatibility libraries installed. I have tried using > gcc296, gcc, and gcc4 and still get the message. The > library,libdl.so.2 is in /lib with a symlink to /usr/lib/libdl.so > Using CentOS 4.0. does libdl.so.2 have _dl_lookup_symbol included? Could nm the libs in the path to ensure that these symbols are correctly being found and linked?