On 7/20/05, Bruno Delbono <Bruno.S.Delbono at mail.ac> wrote: > +++ Edward Croft [Tue Jul 19, 2005 at 01:42:50PM -0400]: > > I get the errors: > > zip4_lnx.a(generic.o)(.text+0xb16): more undefined references to > > `__ctype_b' follow > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_close at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_catch_error at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_addr at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to > > `_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol_skip at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to > > `_dl_lookup_versioned_symbol at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_loaded at GLIBC_2.1' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_open at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_signal_error at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_global_scope at GLIBC_2.0' > > zip4_lnx.a(libdl.so): undefined reference to `_dl_lookup_symbol_skip at GLIBC_2.0' > > > > I have the compatibility libraries installed. I have tried using > > gcc296, gcc, and gcc4 and still get the message. The > > library,libdl.so.2 is in /lib with a symlink to /usr/lib/libdl.so > > Using CentOS 4.0. > > does libdl.so.2 have _dl_lookup_symbol included? Could nm the libs in the > path to ensure that these symbols are correctly being found and linked? > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > How would I find out if libdl.so.2 have _dl_lookup_symbol included? What is nm? Forgive me, I am not a programmer anymore. I last programmed in COBOL days. I am the systems person and we upgraded to CentOS from RHAS21 and now the programmer can't compile. He gave it to me to figure it out. I understand makefiles, et al to a point that I have to compile drivers and such, but my expertise is limited in this area. But always willing to learn a new trick. -- If the sane say the insane are insane, What if the sane are insane? Would that make the insane sane? Explains a lot in Washington! --E. Croft