On Tuesday 28 June 2005 21:18, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > Dude, I haven't seen any proof from you. > All we've gotten was 100% out-of-context assumption. > You can look up board specs, that has *0* to do with this? I had board specs, I had timing diagrams, I had CPU specs, I had chipset docs, I had bus docs, I had ... They all have 0 to do with the problem? What kind of document would you accept? > Traces don't mean squat, we've been through this. Alright - tell me what you want to see :-) > I've contacted the gentleman at AMD regarding the patch, because I can't > find his post in the LKML archives > (I already admitted off-the-bat, before anyone else, it was _not_ in the > February 17, 2004 thread). > > I'm also going through the kernel's VM right now. > There are no less than 5 major models to x86/x86-64. > And it _does_ require you to use a "BIOS hack" that is COMPLETELY > INCOMPATIBLE with PAE36 OSes. Thank you - 32bit only please... we all agree that AMD64 can address more than 4GB without issues. Peter.