[CentOS] [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
decampbell1 at comcast.net
Sat Nov 19 23:13:45 UTC 2005
Just so you know... I subscribe and read and follow most threads... I rarely
post as I bow to other's who are infinately more knowledgable about Linux
and Centos.. but, I DO READ and learn.
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org]On
Behalf Of Chris Mauritz
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 6:10 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC
Dag Wieers wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Craig White wrote:
>>On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 22:07 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>>>Craig, it's not about being interested or disinterested. The
>>>discussion has completely turned into a urinating contest between
>>>those that will and those that won't. Yes, I know how to delete
>>>things, but is still fills up the mailbox with unnecessary chatter. I
>>>don't think I'm alone in wanting the thread to go away either. 3 or 4
>>>days worth is enough. Take it to personal e-mail. I'm in learning
>>>stages with CentOS and linux in general. I sure can't learn anything
>>>from this conversation other than who can create the longest post.
>>so if there's 10 of you that want the thread to die and there's 1000
>>people subscribed does that make it significant?
>Maybe the 990 others are sensible enough to not add their own voice to the
>current noisy mess in order to save whatsever left of this list. At least
>they didn't join the endless discussion.
How many members are there? There are only a small number that post
messages. I'd be curious to know how many people are subscribed to the
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
More information about the CentOS