[CentOS] [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC

David Campbell decampbell1 at comcast.net
Sat Nov 19 23:13:45 UTC 2005

Just so you know... I subscribe and read and follow most threads... I rarely
post as I bow to other's who are infinately more knowledgable about Linux
and Centos..  but, I DO READ and learn.


-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org]On
Behalf Of Chris Mauritz
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 6:10 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT][Practices] The Case for RBAC/MAC

Dag Wieers wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Craig White wrote:
>>On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 22:07 -0500, Sam Drinkard wrote:
>>>Craig, it's not about being interested or disinterested.  The
>>>discussion has completely turned into a urinating contest between
>>>those that will and those that won't.  Yes, I know how to delete
>>>things, but is still fills up the mailbox with unnecessary chatter.  I
>>>don't think I'm alone in wanting the thread to go away either.  3 or 4
>>>days worth is enough.  Take it to personal e-mail.  I'm in learning
>>>stages with CentOS and linux in general.  I sure can't learn anything
>>>from this conversation other than who can create the longest post.
>>so if there's 10 of you that want the thread to die and there's 1000
>>people subscribed does that make it significant?
>Maybe the 990 others are sensible enough to not add their own voice to the
>current noisy mess in order to save whatsever left of this list. At least
>they didn't join the endless discussion.

How many members are there?  There are only a small number that post
messages.  I'd be curious to know how many people are subscribed to the

Best regards,

CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org

More information about the CentOS mailing list