Fri Apr 7 22:00:41 UTC 2006
William L. Maltby <BillsCentOS at triad.rr.com>

On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 17:39 -0400, William Warren wrote:
> Steve Huff wrote:
> > 
> > On Apr 7, 2006, at 8:54 AM, Chris Peikert wrote:
> > 
> >> While downloading almost all the guilds I came across a SELINUX Guide. 
> >> Whats that for?
> > dude.  seriously.
> > 
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=selinux
> > 
> > i'm not trying to be mean to you, but: when you have a question, your 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > -steve
> it's replies like this that give Linux the bad, haughty name it has in 
> the non-technical community.  The following responses warning against 
> asking question lest you get ignored defeat the community approach Linux 
> should have.


You are catching the end of a long set of threads wherein a lot of help
was offered along with good pointers to docs that would help the OP.
AFAICT, he took no advantage and managed to garner a great deal of

Steve's answer was completely appropriate and mild, IMO. If you have any
doubts, search for the OP's name in the archives.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060407/584d9c92/attachment-0005.sig>