On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:35 -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:01:54AM -0700, Dan Trainor wrote: > > >>>Have you ever thought of open-sourcing yours? > > >><snip> > > And I completely agree, unless that puts trade secrets and daily > > operations at risk. But that's another subject entirely. > > > > Like I said, I'd love to, but I cannot :) > > I have to disagree with both points, specially with the second. > If sharing the code put your daily operations at risk, to me that > means "security through obscurity". Ergo, full of bugs. s/Ergo/Maybe/ # Let's not propagate mindless drivel that supports justification of one process by invalid and unproven assumptions about another. I don't by "Ergo" for the same reason I don't buy "We can't withdraw now or all those kids died for no reason!". Fallacious assertion based on invalid or unproven assumptions. > <snip> > Rodrigo Barbosa <snip sig stuff> I believe I could easily be *more* off-topic if led down that path. -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060801/d85483ae/attachment-0005.sig>