William L. Maltby wrote: > On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 15:35 -0300, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:01:54AM -0700, Dan Trainor wrote: >>>>>> Have you ever thought of open-sourcing yours? >>>>> <snip> > >>> And I completely agree, unless that puts trade secrets and daily >>> operations at risk. But that's another subject entirely. >>> >>> Like I said, I'd love to, but I cannot :) >> I have to disagree with both points, specially with the second. >> If sharing the code put your daily operations at risk, to me that >> means "security through obscurity". Ergo, full of bugs. > > s/Ergo/Maybe/ # Let's not propagate mindless drivel that supports > justification of one process by invalid and unproven assumptions about > another. I don't by "Ergo" for the same reason I don't buy "We can't > withdraw now or all those kids died for no reason!". Fallacious > assertion based on invalid or unproven assumptions. > >> <snip> > >> Rodrigo Barbosa > <snip sig stuff> > > I believe I could easily be *more* off-topic if led down that path. Hi - Alright, I think we've killed this topic. Thanks for disagreeing with me. I didn't mean to raise a storm, sorry if your points disagree with mine. IF you have any further questions re: the actual topic, I'd be happy to participate. If not, well, I guess that's the end of it. I'm not going to discuss anything aside from that, thanks. Thanks -dant