Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > Quoting Scott Ehrlich <scott at MIT.EDU>: >> Yes, I know it is old, but I'm looking for a copy of CentOS 3.5 - CDs >> or DVD for i386. > > Anybody in favor of calling CentOS 5 "CentOS 5". No minor versions > added. The way Red Hat is doing it. This 3.x and 4.x thing just > confuses people. > I dont think we'd achieve much with that - Lots of apps and vendors out there that require a specific version like 3.5 or EL3 update 5, and only specifically support that one release and update. Maybe what we need to do is make this info more readily available and clearer to people. So such confusion - about 3.5 being a different version from 3.8 - does not come up. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq