Matthew Miller wrote: > There was a rumor (here? somewhere.) that RHEL5 will actually have "forked" > versions for the u1, u2, etc. updates, so there actually *will* be something > equivalent to 5.1 and 5.2. (The current way, practically speaking, forces > one to accept a huge bunch of updates all at once several times a year, > because future security updates assume those are in place.) Anyone have any > insight as to whether this is the path upstream will be following? > afaik, that might happen with the 4U5, and could carry onto 5 as well. But I've not heard nor seen anything official looking from upstream that might indicate they are doing this or even the sort of policy they plan on implementing. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq