Craig White wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:15 -0500, Chris Mauritz wrote: > >> Craig White wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 09:19 -0800, Scott Silva wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Think of Fedora as a giant public beta test, and the Enterprise versions as >>>> the result. >>>> >>>> >>> ---- >>> that's a bit simplistic. In some cases, that is true, in many cases, it >>> is not true. Fedora is a much richer Desktop experience which may be >>> what is desired. >>> >>> >>> >> If you'll read the original post, you'll notice his query was for >> "server" usage. >> > ---- > If I'll read the original post? Do you mean this one? > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-January/018774.html > > Where he says that it's a server for X desktops? > > The reason I am responding is that I didn't much appreciate the > inference that I wasn't completely aware of the original post and wonder > why you felt it necessary to make that inference. > > If you want to attack my opinion, by all means have at it. > > If you want to suggest that I didn't follow the thread, you are clearly > wrong. I shouldn't have to defend myself from this type of insinuation. > What on earth did I do to deserve that missive? I simply thought you missed the original post. You're reading criticism into my post that simply wasn't there. Jeez. <Steve Martin> Excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse me! </Steve Martin> 8-) Cheers,