On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 13:40, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > My recollection is that if any drive in an LVM fails the whole LVM
> > fails.
> >
>
> LVM doesn't fail .. but hard drives do. If a hard drive failed that was
> part of the LVM, you would lose all that info, true. That is why one
> should use a CRC type RAID (1, 1+0, 5) under LVM ... (or LVM on top of
> RAID) :)
>
> Then you can replace the failed drive and keep going.
Is there a simple way to install the system on LVM-on-top-of-RAID1?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com