[CentOS] Syslog
Sam Drinkard
sam at wa4phy.net
Wed Jun 28 01:25:32 UTC 2006
Jason Bradley Nance wrote:
>> It was not the package itself. It's OK. it was the syslog.conf
>> that I had made an error in an entry I didn't catch at first. There
>> is no such thing as a "local8" and that is what I had for logging.
>> That was what was killing the whole shebang. I knew the syslog had
>> changed, I just didn't catch the error by being in a hurry.
>
> You said you had DEFAULT install. Here's the exact quote:
>
> Me: "Is this a default syslog config or has it been modified to maybe
> redirect to a logging box?"
>
> You: "No, logging box -- everything as far as syslog and messages is
> default."
>
> Redirecting all logging to a different level is not default.
>
> The point is if you would have ran the command and seen that the
> config file had changed you could have looked into it and saw that
> there was something messed up.
>
> j
>
>
> --
> Jason Bradley Nance What would you cry for?
> aitrus at tresgeek.net Swallow your pride for?
> Tres Geek What would you go wild for?
> http://tresgeek.net/
> -Poe, "Wild"
I *DID* look at the config file, and I knew when I looked, it had
changed. When I stated it was a default install, I meant there was no
logging box involved. If you insist on continuing on with this dialog
because I didn't do as you stated, then take it offline. Nobody wants
to hear two grown men bitch at each other. As far as I'm concerned,
this discussion is over. I made the mistake, and I admitted it. What
more do you want? A confession?
--
Sam W.Drinkard -- sam at wa4phy.net
NOAA Cooperative Observer KAGS (snow)
http://wa4phy.net
Augusta Area Mesonet
More information about the CentOS
mailing list