On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 19:19 -0400, Chris Mauritz wrote: > Chris Mauritz wrote: > > Max H. wrote: > >> Congrats to the CentOS at Home Folding Team! I see we're creeping up to > >> break the 700 rank for teams. > >> > > > > We should make even more headway soon as I just took delivery of a > > bunch of dual opteron systems which need to be stress tested for a few > > weeks prior to deployment. 8-) > > Cheers, > > ....which reminds me. I haven't delved into the 64-bit CentOS on > production machines yet. Are there any glaring potential gotchas for > generic LAMP type usage? They won't be doing anything exotic...just > serving up web content and perhaps replace some dedicated DNS/bind and > mail/postfix boxes. All the old systems being replaced are currently > running CentOS 3.7 and I'd like to start migrating everything to 64-bit 4.3. > So long as you are just doing server stuff and can keep everything x86_64 and keep i386 packages off the box, x86_64 works great. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060510/d5bf59b7/attachment-0005.sig>