[CentOS] gnbd vs drbd

[saptarshi naha]

I have used GNBD for xen migration and works like a champ and is also
recommended by xen team. I dont know if that helps.

On 11/7/06, Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at darkover.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success.
> Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization
> issues (mostly on lab situations).
>
> Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try.
>
> Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ?
>
> TIA,
>
> - --
> Rodrigo Barbosa
> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur"
> "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns)
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFFT/Z1pdyWzQ5b5ckRAiXlAJ9gAJNtx7amdZJ2gKfAsxmRSCm/zwCfYy9D
> zr7kN3JjBz1HY/5zgT0ylq8=
> =6FOA
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>