[CentOS] yum vs up2date
John Summerfied
debian at herakles.homelinux.orgThu Sep 7 01:07:39 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Johnny Hughes wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 13:34 +0800, John Summerfied wrote: > FC3 is past end of life, does it matter :) > FC3 is a) The version of FC3 I know best b) What RHEL4 is based on c) Supported by Fedora Legacy OTOH FC5 is basically broken and I'm thinking of replacing it with Suse 10.1 on at least one system:-) -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ Please do not reply off-list
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list