[CentOS] yum vs up2date
Paul
subsolar at subsolar.comThu Sep 7 02:14:59 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:07 +0800, John Summerfied wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 13:34 +0800, John Summerfied wrote: > > > > FC3 is past end of life, does it matter :) > > > FC3 is > a) The version of FC3 I know best > b) What RHEL4 is based on > c) Supported by Fedora Legacy > > OTOH FC5 is basically broken and I'm thinking of replacing it with Suse > 10.1 on at least one system:-) FC5 broken? Funny I use it every day as a desktop. SUSE 10.1 every install I've tried won't update correctly without manual intervention to get the updater working. ::SIGH:: Maybe 10.2 will be worth looking at. Paul
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list