thad wrote: > It is a matter of record [53] that IBM's approach to LVM was > rejected by Linus Torvalds in favor of a different approach. > Accordingly, even if we were to stipulate that IBM had access to old > SCO's LVM technology, any attempted misappropriation came to naught. That was a different matter; EVMS vs LVM. And even there Linus was and is wrong. The Linux implementation is "good enough" and linux as an OS can probably live with it. It is just a little sad that "good enough" is enough sometimes, esp. when the alternative is not harder to implement. But this is getting pretty off-topic. -- //Morten Torstensen //Email: morten at mortent.org //IM: Cartoon at jabber.no morten.torstensen at gmail.com And if it turns out that there is a God, I don't believe that he is evil. The worst that can be said is that he's an underachiever.