[CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Dec 7 00:10:50 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I would say that the only thing that needs to top this off is some > rumours that the other side is going to use bitkeeper for its source > control, or ESR saying they thought that ZYZ was now his preferred > repo and RMS saying that the other was the only true repository. ...or why Linux can't include zfs because it can't be restricted enough to call it free. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list