[CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comFri Dec 7 00:10:50 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> I would say that the only thing that needs to top this off is some
> rumours that the other side is going to use bitkeeper for its source
> control, or ESR saying they thought that ZYZ was now his preferred
> repo and RMS saying that the other was the only true repository.
...or why Linux can't include zfs because it can't be restricted enough
to call it free.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list