[CentOS] Re: are RPMForge and EPEL compatible?

Les Mikesell wrote:
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>
>> I would say that the only thing that needs to top this off is some
>> rumours that the other side is going to use bitkeeper for its source
>> control, or ESR saying they thought that ZYZ was now his preferred
>> repo and RMS saying that the other was the only true repository.
> 
> ...or why Linux can't include zfs because it can't be restricted enough 
> to call it free.
> 

les,

drop this subject here, if you want to carry on talking about it - take it to 
epel or rpmforge lists.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq