Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: > >> Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. >>>>>> If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and >>>>>> see what it's doing? >>>>>> Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not >>>>>> executable, which should be easy to fix. >>>>>> >>>>>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> All.... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker >>>>>>> staff have been helpful but no cigar. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine >>>>>>> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received >>>>>>> the same error. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called >>>>>>> eula which fails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ./eula: cannot execute binary file >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use >>>>>>> Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be >>>>>>> listening to this list and could give me a hand. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks much!!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Greg Ennis >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their >>>>> installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In >>>>> looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks >>>>> like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and >>>>> received the same error : >>>>> >>>>> [root at MailIn install]# ./eula >>>>> -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file >>>>> >>>>> The file is executable : >>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula >>>>> >>>>> The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : >>>>> ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D >>>>> ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j >>>>> ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^\<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^\,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for your help!! >>>>> >>>>> Greg >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> CentOS mailing list >>>>> CentOS at centos.org >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> What information is returned when you type file eula ? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> typing in ./eula returns >>> -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file >>> >>> I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the >>> results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system >>> different than EL5 Linux. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> CentOS mailing list >>> CentOS at centos.org >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >>> >>> >>> >> Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on >> one of my systems if I type >> >> file /usr/bin/pstree >> >> /usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 >> (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped >> >> >> > > Clint, > > Sorry... did . not understand your grammar thanks for the clarification > > Here is the result. > eula: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module not stripped > > Looks like to me that they gave me the wrong binaries. Do you agree? > > Greg > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > Hi, Definitely. I can't tell you off hand what system its compiler for but most likely AIX or PowerPC. Tkae Care