On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:36 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: > Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 16:12 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: > > > >> Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 15:47 +1300, Clint Dilks wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 15:32 -0800, Liam Kirsher wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Does eula stand for End User Licensing Agreement, perhaps? Just a guess. > >>>>>> If it's a script why don't you just look in it (the calling script) and > >>>>>> see what it's doing? > >>>>>> Also, maybe the eula binary exists (did you look for it?) but is not > >>>>>> executable, which should be easy to fix. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> All.... > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I am trying to install vsifax on a 64 bit Centos 5.1 system. The Esker > >>>>>>> staff have been helpful but no cigar. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> At first they thought the problem might be related to a 64 bit machine > >>>>>>> so I tried to install vsifax on a 32 bit Centos 5.1 machine and received > >>>>>>> the same error. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> One of their installation scripts is trying to execute a binary called > >>>>>>> eula which fails. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ./eula: cannot execute binary file > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The tech support of vsifax advised me they had one other customer use > >>>>>>> Centos 4.5 and succeeded in a vsifax installation. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I was hoping whoever had the other vsifax installation might be > >>>>>>> listening to this list and could give me a hand. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks much!!! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Greg Ennis > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> The vsifax documentation does not declare what the file is, but their > >>>>> installation scripts try to execute the 'eula' file and and fails. In > >>>>> looking at the contents of the file it is not a simple script, but looks > >>>>> like a binary executable file. I tried to execute the file manually and > >>>>> received the same error : > >>>>> > >>>>> [root at MailIn install]# ./eula > >>>>> -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file > >>>>> > >>>>> The file is executable : > >>>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 227 105 374644 Apr 19 2007 eula > >>>>> > >>>>> The file is not a script, The beginning of the file is : > >>>>> ^Aß^@^DF'<90>V^@^DGz^@^@^Oe^@H^P^B^A^K^@^A^@^BÅø^@^@f<98>^@^@^@^D > >>>>> ^@ià^P^@^A( ^@^G ^@j > >>>>> ´^@^B^@^A^@^B^@^B^@^D^@^C^@^E^@^C1L^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@.text^@^@^@^P^@^A(^P^@^A(^@^BÅø^@^@^A(^@^C<94>Ä^@^@^@^@ î^@^@^@^@^@ .data^@^@^@ ^@^G ^@^G ^@^@f<98>^@^BÇ ^@^Cø^P^@^@^@^@^Gñ^@^@^@^@^@@.bss^@^@^@^@ ^@m¸ ^@m¸^@^@^@^D^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<80>.loader^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@g^K^@^C-¸^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^P^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@^@<82>"^@$|n^[x|<8f>#x|°+x|^^ø^@<91>Â^@^@<91>â^@^D<82>1^@^@<81>B^@(9 ^@^@e)^D^C-^Q^@^@<91>*^@^@@<82>^@^PH^@^@<91>`^@^@^@H^@^@^T<83>â^@0H^@^A<81><80>A^@^T|n^[xA<8a>^@^\<80>^Q^@^@<90>A^@^T| ^C¦<80>Q^@^DN<80>^D!<80>A^@^T<80>â^@89^@^@^@}Ãsx}ä{x~^E<83>x<91>^G^@^@H^@^Ai`^@^@^@<80>â^@^\,^G^@^@A<82>^@^H<80>b^@ H^B^T<81><80>A^@^T|<81>^H^H^@^@^@^@^@^L @^@^@^@^@^@^@^@¬^@^G__start^@^@^@<80>b^@^H|^H^B¦,^C^@^@<94>!ÿÀ<90>^A^@HA<82>^@À<81>c^@^@<90>A^@^T}h^C¦<81>c^@^H<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^L,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^P,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^T,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<80>b^@^X,^C^@^@A<82>^@^\<80>^C^@^@<81>c^@^H|^H^C¦<80>C^@^DN<80>^@!<80>A^@^T<81><81>^@H8!^@@}<88>^C¦N<80>^@ 8!^@@N<80>^@ ^@^@^@^@^@^@ A<80>^@^@^@^@^@^@Ü^@^N__threads_init<80>^@^@,<81><82>^@4<90>A^@^T > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for your help!! > >>>>> > >>>>> Greg > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> CentOS mailing list > >>>>> CentOS at centos.org > >>>>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> What information is returned when you type file eula ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> typing in ./eula returns > >>> -bash: ./eula: cannot execute binary file > >>> > >>> I have also tested some of their binary executable files and get the > >>> results. I looks like to me that they complied the files for a system > >>> different than EL5 Linux. > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> CentOS mailing list > >>> CentOS at centos.org > >>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> Hi, if you type file <file to test> it should give you information eg on > >> one of my systems if I type > >> > >> file /usr/bin/pstree > >> > >> /usr/bin/pstree: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 > >> (SYSV), for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped > >> > >> > >> > > > > Clint, > > > > Sorry... did . not understand your grammar thanks for the clarification > > > > Here is the result. > > eula: executable (RISC System/6000 V3.1) or obj module not stripped > > > > Looks like to me that they gave me the wrong binaries. Do you agree? > > > > Greg > > _______________________________________________ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS at centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > Hi, Definitely. > > I can't tell you off hand what system its compiler for but most likely > AIX or PowerPC. > > Tkae Care > > _______________________________________________ Thanks for your help !!!!! I'll give Esker the information !!!