John Summerfield wrote:
>>
>> Is there some reason to use Centos 2.x instead of 3.x? I don't see
>> any showstopper issues between everything I have running on 7.3
>> and Centos 3, although I'd probably install from scratch and
>> back in my old configs instead of expecting an upgrade to work.
>
> Centos 2.1 is basically RHL 7.2,
That sounds like a good reason to not use it... A lot of things
didn't actually work right until 7.3 or some subsequent update
mod_perl for example). But maybe the fixes were also backed into
the enterprise 2.x updates.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com