Les Mikesell wrote: > John Summerfield wrote: >>> >>> Is there some reason to use Centos 2.x instead of 3.x? I don't see >>> any showstopper issues between everything I have running on 7.3 >>> and Centos 3, although I'd probably install from scratch and >>> back in my old configs instead of expecting an upgrade to work. >> >> Centos 2.1 is basically RHL 7.2, > > That sounds like a good reason to not use it... A lot of things > didn't actually work right until 7.3 or some subsequent update > mod_perl for example). But maybe the fixes were also backed into > the enterprise 2.x updates. One might reasonably expect that all such problems got fixed in the commercial offering;-) How else would it be worth paying truckloads of dollars for it? -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Please do not reply off-list