[CentOS] Is BIND In CentOS 5.0 Broken?
Jim Perrin
jperrin at gmail.comMon Jul 2 00:20:32 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is BIND In CentOS 5.0 Broken?
- Next message: [CentOS] Is BIND In CentOS 5.0 Broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 7/1/07, Eduardo Dela Rosa <eduardo.delarosa at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > After the completing the installation, I wanted to configure my DNS server > but it seemed that /etc/named.conf and other stuffs in > /var/named/chroot/var/named directory are not > there (i.e., *.zone, *.local, etc). > This is not a 'bug' or 'broken' package so to speak, but more a concious decision by the upstream folks. See the bugzilla report here -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234508 > Can anyone give me idea? This is the first time that I've tried CentOS; used > to have Fedora Core and RHEL; but I know CentOS is a RHEL fork; just don't > know what exactly the > other differences are. Basically you can copy the 'example' files from /usr/share/doc/ or use system-config-bind to set things up. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell
- Previous message: [CentOS] Is BIND In CentOS 5.0 Broken?
- Next message: [CentOS] Is BIND In CentOS 5.0 Broken?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list