[CentOS] Is BIND In CentOS 5.0 Broken?

Thanks for the quick reply, Jim; much appreciated :)

Cheers!

On 7/2/07, Jim Perrin <jperrin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/1/07, Eduardo Dela Rosa <eduardo.delarosa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > After the completing the installation, I wanted to configure my DNS
> server
> > but it seemed that /etc/named.conf and other stuffs in
> > /var/named/chroot/var/named directory are not
> > there  (i.e., *.zone, *.local, etc).
> >
>
> This is not a 'bug' or 'broken' package so to speak, but more a
> concious decision by the upstream folks. See the bugzilla report here
> -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234508
>
> > Can anyone give me idea? This is the first time that I've tried CentOS;
> used
> > to have Fedora Core and RHEL; but I know CentOS is a RHEL fork; just
> don't
> > know what exactly the
> > other differences are.
>
> Basically you can copy the 'example' files from /usr/share/doc/ or use
> system-config-bind to set things up.
>
> --
> During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
> revolutionary act.
> George Orwell
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS at centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
Eduardo Dela Rosa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070702/46783938/attachment-0001.html>