beast wrote: > On 26/07/07 11:21 +0700, beast wrote: >>> CentOS 5.0 as the base, but OpenOffice repo, Firefox repo and >>> possibly Gnome or KDE repo to keep primary office applications >>> current. >> >> I'm confused here. Suppose in the next 3 year the latest OO version is >> 3.1.1, >> today OO in Centos5 is 2.0.4, will it get updated to version 3.x or still >> using 2.x? > > It seems not. Updates directory in Centos 3 still contains OOv1.1.2 only. > So, what is the meaning of "supported for 5 years"? is it only for bug and > security fixes, not features or enhancements? Sometimes you get enhancements and features. > > Suppose in the next year, standard interface for harddisk is WATA > (wireless ATA > :), will it be added in Centos5? The RHEL4 kernel did get a libata update. > > Sorry for asking such questions, i just reaaly want to know here :) > >> or better just upgrade to Centos7 which has OOv3.1? > > If I choose this path, can it be automatically done using yum with local > repository? what about existing data/settings/custom apps/etc? anyone has > real experiences on upgrading OS? You really want apt and deb based distros like ubuntu if you want to go this route. > > Personally, I never upgrade the OS. I simply install the fresh one, but its > fine on my laptop, not for my clients. Use images then if all your 400 workstations are identical.