On 6/26/07, Jean Figarella <jfigarella at vecna.com> wrote: > Jim Perrin wrote: > > On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > >> So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. > >> Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing > >> improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to > >> look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)? > > > > Actually, Firefox 2.x irritates the crap out of me with the newer > > search option. Instead of /foo to search a page for foo and having the > > option to find it again, you now have to hit ctrl+f, windows style for > > searching. the /foo still works, but times out quickly and doesn't > > give you the option to move to the next found location. > > > > I'd say sit tight for a while on the RH version unless there's a > > feature/plugin you REALLY need/want. > > > > you can do "/' to search, and if it does finds something the "ctrl" + > "f" and it will give you the option to find more. But I agree it is > annoying that it doesn't give you the "find next" option when using "/" > to search. > > -Jean You'll notice that Ctrl+G does a "Find Next". Always has, even in quick find.