Brian Mathis wrote: > On 6/26/07, Jean Figarella <jfigarella at vecna.com> wrote: >> Jim Perrin wrote: >> > On 6/14/07, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> >> So I am looking at Firefox and Thunderbird 2.0. >> >> Should I install them? Or is Redhat correct that there is nothing >> >> improved here and wait for 3.0? (well I have not even had a chance to >> >> look at Thunderbird 2.0, that is new)? >> > >> > Actually, Firefox 2.x irritates the crap out of me with the newer >> > search option. Instead of /foo to search a page for foo and having the >> > option to find it again, you now have to hit ctrl+f, windows style for >> > searching. the /foo still works, but times out quickly and doesn't >> > give you the option to move to the next found location. >> > >> > I'd say sit tight for a while on the RH version unless there's a >> > feature/plugin you REALLY need/want. >> > >> >> you can do "/' to search, and if it does finds something the "ctrl" + >> "f" and it will give you the option to find more. But I agree it is >> annoying that it doesn't give you the "find next" option when using "/" >> to search. >> >> -Jean > > > You'll notice that Ctrl+G does a "Find Next". Always has, even in quick > find. Sweet , thanks. that is very helpful. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos