[CentOS] prefdm still unfinished?
mattdm at mattdm.org
Sun Mar 18 19:26:21 UTC 2007
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 02:28:37PM +0900, John Summerfield wrote:
> >One downside of the current scheme is that there's no error checking for
> >invalid values. If you've put something that isn't valid, it just fails
> >without explaining.
> This is the error checking in Nahant. Those are line numbers.
> 31 # Fallbacks, in order
> 32 exec gdm $* >/dev/null 2>&1
> 33 exec kdm $* >/dev/null 2>&1
> 34 exec xdm $* >/dev/null 2>&1
> If none of those takes, you aren't going to get a GUI login.
Right, that's not checking for invalid values. It's just providing a
fallback and crossing fingers.
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
More information about the CentOS