Feizhou <feizhou at graffiti.net> wrote: John Summerfield wrote: > Feizhou wrote: >> >>> I generally prefer Asus motherboards, I quite like Via chips and SIS >>> works well too (but it is low-spec). >> >> >> I will give Asus second thoughts because their BIOS sucks, I will never > > Specifically, what's wrong with the BIOS? APIC tables or ACPI issues. I have seen many reports of needing kernel parameters to get stability on various Asus boards that are apic or acpi related besides having first hand experience with one particular board. > > >> ever touch a VIA board again (I have a socket A VIA board for my home > > One bad VIA experience? FYI, the linux kernel developers have code specifically just for 'Via Quirks' which are reverse-engineered from what I see on LKML. If you like to trust VIA's mucking about with the PCI bus or what not to get some 'short cuts' without releasing data about this behaviour then be my guest. _______________________________________________ Hum... I have a VIA motherboard, an ABIT KT7A and the ACPI works fine with Centos 4.1. I did have some screen saver issuses at first but got around them by using xscreensaver. No problems powering down the machine at shutdown. All PCI devies work fine. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070314/0af2d777/attachment-0005.html>