Leonardo: This is probably a little off-topic, but I use mutt to send attachments through email from a script. ( It's good for automatically generated files such as the results of a system backup, etc. ) I also have a nifty little utility that polls a certain network directory and picks up text files that are a certain format and sends them through email (with an optional attachment) -- this allows me to generate log files on a "legacy server" that will automatically be emailed, without worrying about figuring out how to automatically email something in Windows. (I'd much rather implement something in Linux than Windows, given a choice.) Leonardo Pinheiro wrote: > On 3/27/07, Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at darkover.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:07:48PM +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: >> > Not in my mutt >:) > >> <...> but >> Mutt is defaulting that particular attachment to iso-8859-1 here > > > I am sorry, I couldn't understand the Mutt part. Does that mean you've > been using Mutt? :-) > > How good is it? > > Any comments on the differences (productivity, mail filtering, etc) > from the graphical mail clients? Why do you use it? > > Thanks > Leonardo > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos