John Summerfield wrote: > I don't understand the current rationale for a single CentOS users' > list; probably in times past it was sensible, but I think the time has > come for splitting the list by release. We've been down this route before - and the same things are going to be said now that were said previously, we are not going to be splitting the list based on Release and/or Arch. It might have worked for others, but we dont want to split the community up into fragments. And, personally, I think this is working very well - we get max eyeballs and people dont need to be subscribed to a multiple lists to keep an eye on stuff. Perhaps when membership of the list hits 50,000 we might reconsider - but were not there yet. What might be worth looking at was to create more lists ( not split ) based on technology (eg. CentOS-Clustering ), but we've not really had any request for those, afict. And as Les has already pointed out - most stuff in the lists is common. perhaps you should consider compress'd digests for your mailing lists traffic. - KB -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq