Ioannis Vranos wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> >> There's always gmail if you'd rather have a web interface and not >> worry about the bulk of messages you skip. > > > That's a great suggestion. Web email sounds as a great solution to > John's problems. Web browsing sucks. It often takes me minutes to download pages. Reread my ping times (those were good, here's another set) and how much I download. [summer at bilby ~]$ ping -c4 terad.net PING terad.net (203.15.140.104) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from terad.net (203.15.140.104): icmp_seq=0 ttl=247 time=777 ms 64 bytes from terad.net (203.15.140.104): icmp_seq=1 ttl=247 time=2865 ms --- terad.net ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 2 received, 50% packet loss, time 11627ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 777.745/1821.475/2865.206/1043.731 ms, pipe 4 [summer at bilby ~]$ My mail arrives and I can read at LAN speeds. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu Please do not reply off-list