Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: > > On 10/22/07, Ralph Angenendt <[1]ra+centos at br-online.de> wrote: > So which version of bind is that? > > [root at mailgw named]# rpm -qa |grep bind > bind-utils-9.2.4-24.EL4 > bind-libs-9.2.4-24.EL4 > bind-9.2.4-24.EL4 > bind-chroot-9.2.4-24.EL4 > > Did you update it? > I now checked. the below are the latest @ CentOS 4 branch. I am going to > update to the below. NO. It is not. The latest ones are the ones below. So you haven't run a single "yum update" since you installed the box but are worried about a bind malfunction, which is nasty, but not a very critical one, while missing loads of security related updates since then? > [2]http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/4/updates/i386/RPMS/bind-9.2.4-27.0. > 1.el4.i386.rpm Yes. And a *simple* yum update would have fetched those for you nearly three months ago! Ralph PS: STOP SENDING ME OFF LIST COPIES. I read here. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20071022/156e1a68/attachment-0004.sig>