[CentOS] Re: vfs objects = recycle

Mon Apr 28 23:24:35 UTC 2008
John <jses27 at gmail.com>



-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf
Of Scott Silva
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:10 PM
To: centos at centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Re: vfs objects = recycle

on 4-25-2008 11:46 AM John spake the following:
> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:13 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
>> on 4-25-2008 8:04 AM John spake the following:
>>> [public]
>>>         vfs objects = recycle
>>>         recycle:repository = Recycle Bin
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Just want to be clear if I use the vfs recycle option does 
>>> "recycle:repository = Recycle Bin" get put into the the public 
>>> directory? As I am having a problem with deleting files on a client 
>>> and then can't empty the trash because of permission problems. Will 
>>> this solve this issue or do I have problems elsewhere?
>>> Keep in mind this is a mixed node network with windows and linux. 
>>> I'm taking pointers from any one with heavy samba experiance. As I 
>>> am no samba guy. Also pointers on clustering samba with DFS.
>> It gets put in the root of the share that you activate it in. I am 
>> not sure if you can make it a global option, but maybe.
> That's where it gets put. After editing the conf file and putting the 
> option in.
>> I'm not sure of what your issue is, when you say "empty the trash" do 
>> you mean deleting files from "Recycle Bin"?
> Logged in as root on a linux client using share mode can't delete a 
> file or folder when made by root on the samba server in one of the shares.
> That is using the user nobody. Would that be correct as user nobody 
> only can't delete file made by root n the samba server.
> I suspect after really thinking about it I'll be much better of adding 
> the linux client to Active Directory and do all authentication that 
> way to solve everything. Then later on setup samba to serve the 
> Windows user profiles.
I'm not on AD yet, hoping to put that bullet off for a while.

I kinda Beg to differ on that bullet. MS Admins know Active Directory is
about the holey grail of authentication in corporate networking. Single Sign
Authentication says it all. I have reliazed I am spinning in the wind to
have two different auth mechanisms. My scope of view is automate any and
everything that can be. Consolodate services to save money (microsoft
licence fees) Means actually only two MS servers Primary and Secondary
Domain Controllers (PDC and BDC).

I left out LDAP Servers for a reason. Not so easy to use and setup versus

MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't!!!!