on 4-28-2008 4:24 PM John spake the following: > > > > John > > -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf > Of Scott Silva > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:10 PM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] Re: vfs objects = recycle > > on 4-25-2008 11:46 AM John spake the following: >> On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 11:13 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: >>> on 4-25-2008 8:04 AM John spake the following: >>>> [public] >>>> >>>> vfs objects = recycle >>>> recycle:repository = Recycle Bin >>>> -------------------------------------- >>>> Just want to be clear if I use the vfs recycle option does >>>> "recycle:repository = Recycle Bin" get put into the the public >>>> directory? As I am having a problem with deleting files on a client >>>> and then can't empty the trash because of permission problems. Will >>>> this solve this issue or do I have problems elsewhere? >>>> >>>> Keep in mind this is a mixed node network with windows and linux. >>>> I'm taking pointers from any one with heavy samba experiance. As I >>>> am no samba guy. Also pointers on clustering samba with DFS. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> It gets put in the root of the share that you activate it in. I am >>> not sure if you can make it a global option, but maybe. >> That's where it gets put. After editing the conf file and putting the >> option in. >> >>> I'm not sure of what your issue is, when you say "empty the trash" do >>> you mean deleting files from "Recycle Bin"? >> Logged in as root on a linux client using share mode can't delete a >> file or folder when made by root on the samba server in one of the shares. >> That is using the user nobody. Would that be correct as user nobody >> only can't delete file made by root n the samba server. >> >> I suspect after really thinking about it I'll be much better of adding >> the linux client to Active Directory and do all authentication that >> way to solve everything. Then later on setup samba to serve the >> Windows user profiles. >> > I'm not on AD yet, hoping to put that bullet off for a while. > > I kinda Beg to differ on that bullet. MS Admins know Active Directory is > about the holey grail of authentication in corporate networking. Single Sign > Authentication says it all. I have reliazed I am spinning in the wind to > have two different auth mechanisms. My scope of view is automate any and > everything that can be. Consolodate services to save money (microsoft > licence fees) Means actually only two MS servers Primary and Secondary > Domain Controllers (PDC and BDC). > > I left out LDAP Servers for a reason. Not so easy to use and setup versus > AD. > Just postponing the learning to a less busy time. Maybe with some experimentation time before going live. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080428/413961e5/attachment-0005.sig>