on 12-5-2008 2:15 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: > On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Andrew Hull <list-lr4zqxr38cVWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > >> I've never used IPCop (opting for m0n0wall instead), but I was under the >> impression that IPCop lacked any content filtering features requested by >> the OP. >> >> A quick perusing of the website leads me to believe its trying to be a >> kick-ass beige-box firewall/router (and most-likely succeeding), but it >> seems like a content filter it is not. Did I miss some glaring features? > > I use IPCop for our Firewall/Router at home, but there are people on > this list (Scott, etc.) who use it in the Enterprise. If you check out > the IPCop web site <http://www.ipcop.org> possibly you will find > there is an Add On available that will do what you need to do. There are several good addons for ipcop, and I do use it in the enterprise, but if you want something CentOS based, Clarkconnect is just as good. I think it is CentOS 4 based currently and it has a decent content filter and also scans for viruses. The only reason I don't use it in the enterprise was the poor reliability if its Ipsec tunnels that I also need running on the same boxes. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 250 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20081207/a188c424/attachment-0004.sig>