On Tuesday 15 July 2008, Tony Schreiner wrote: > On Jul 15, 2008, at 5:45 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: ... > > But at this point it's probably relevant to ask why do you care? I > > have seen > > many high performance PCI, PCI-X and PCI-express cards but PCI- > > X-2? ...that > > hasn't seen any wide use at all. Do you really have a card that is > > PCI-X-2? > > As I understand it it's quite dead in the water and everyone has > > moved on to > > PCI-express. > > > > /Peter > > Thanks for the pointers. The reason I asked the question is I'm > investigating some Fibre Channel HBA's and was asked if I had if I > had PCI-X v2 available. I agree that I have not seen it mentioned in > the press or anywhere else very much. > > Tony Schreiner I see, for FC I'd go with a 8x PCI-express HBA. /Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080715/17499674/attachment-0003.sig>