On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > Victor Padro wrote: > > isnt freenas also unionfs ? > > > > Yes it is. > > I would therefore pass on freenas, purely on that one point. > > My HDs are not using UFS they're on Ext2 > Also, conder trimming your posts please > What does that mean, I'm not a native speaker so I didn't follow that, sorry. Didn't want to ofend or even make mistakes, my only point its that freenas could do the job under a SMB enviroment. And I don't even compare CentOS between FreeNAS in anything. > -- > Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- "It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion." "Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas" -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20080702/d78ccd29/attachment-0005.html>